Freedom of Speech, anti-SLAPP statute, Wynn, Chanos

"....Defendant Jim Chanos will and hereby does move this Court for an Order striking the sole cause of action in Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §425.16. Jim Chanos requests that the Court strike Plaintiffs’ Complaint because it arises from Jim Chanos’s exercise of his right of free speech under the United States and California Constitutions, and because Plaintiffs cannot establish a probability that they will prevail on the merits of their claim...."

Journalists, authors, bloggers, website publishers, et al, take note:

Stephen Wynn & Wynn Resorts v James Chanos - Chanos Motion to Strike by Sam E. Antar

Stephen Wynn, Wynn Resorts v James Chanos - Order Denying Discovery Prior to Anti-Slapp

hat tip: Jim Chanos vs Stephen Wynn: Chanos Motion to Strike

more news links below (on mobile go to web version link below)

Follow @expvccom